Issue 29
M.L. De Bellis et alii, Frattura ed Integrità Strutturale, 29 (2014) 37-48; DOI: 10.3221/IGF-ESIS.29.05
(2)
= E LU
where the compatibility operator is defined as
0 0
1 X
0
0
X
2
0
2 X X X X
1
= L
.
(3)
2
2
1
0
0
X
1
0
0
X
2
According to the strain driven approach, the macroscopic strain components, evaluated at , X are used as input variables for the microscopic level. The kinematic map, expressed in function of the vector , E is imposed on the UC, properly defining a BVP. At the micro-level a repetitive rectangular UC is selected, whose size is 1 2 2 2 a a and its centre is located at the macroscopic point , X characterized by the displacement field 1 2 ={ , } T u u u , defined at each point 1 2 = , T x x x of the UC domain . The displacement field, resulting in the UC after solving the BVP, can be represented as the superposition of the assigned field u X, x and a perturbation field : u X, x = u X, x u X, x u X, x (5) The strain vector at the microscopic level is derived by applying the kinematic operator defined for the 2D Cauchy problem and, in expanded form, it results as:
1 2 12
0
,1
(6)
= ,
with
and
= 0
ε lu
ε
l x
,2
,2
,1
indicating the partial derivative with respect to . i
x According to Eq. (5), the strain can be written as:
with , i
ε X x ε X x ε X x (7) The third order polynomial map, proposed in [5 ,6] and modified in [7], is used. Different material symmetries can be considered ranging between the isotropic and the orthotropic case. In the considered orthotropic case, the kinematic map can be written in compact form as: , = u X x A x E X (8) with , = , ,
1 2
1 2
2
2 1 12 1 x
2
3
1 1 2 1 2 s b x x c x 3
2
3
x
x
1 1 2 x x
x
0
1
2
2
(9)
A x
1 1 1 2 2
2
2
2
3
3
2 1 2 2 1 b x x c x 3
x x
x
x
2 1 2 x x
s
0
2
1 1
12 2
39
Made with FlippingBook - Online Brochure Maker