Fatigue Crack Paths 2003
develop on maximumshear planes for all metals. For instance, for 304 stainless steel
the critical plane corresponds to maximal tensile strain and usually the plane orientation
depends on the type of loading.
A more consistent approach is obtained by not specifying the critical plane approach
in advance but requiring the maximumof the failure condition to be reached with re
spect to all orientations, thus
(6)
()*c)(,,,maxFFnnnn=γετσn,
where F c represents the critical value reached by the failure condition. The present defi
nition provides the critical plane which is also the extremal plane, so that the critical
condition is not violated on other potential failure planes.
A particular form of Eq. (6) is obtained by applying the strain energy density asso
ciated with the amplitudes of stress and strain components acting on the critical plane,
cf. Glinka et al. [11]
Δ Δ
W
n n τ γ
σ ε
=
⎢⎣⎡
+ Δ Δ n
⎥⎦⎤
*
n
(7)
max)(
c
n
2 2 2 2
.
This parameter represents only a fraction of the strain energy. However, it does not ac
count for the effect of mean stress. An alternative energy condition was proposed by
Chu [10] by combining maximumnormal and shear stresses with the strain amplitudes,
thus
) n n n n ε σ γ τ Δ + Δ max (8)
(
W
=
m a x ) ( 2maxn
.
*c
The cohesive crack model pioneered by Dugdale [12] and Barrenblatt [13] can be re
garded as further extension of the critical plane approach. It is assumed that when the
critical stress or strain condition is reached on the extremal plane, the gradual separation
on this plane is developed, thus generating a damage zone preceding the crack. The
critical stress condition can be assumed in the form
(9)
()[]0,,maxc≤δστσnnFn,
where σc(δ) is the cohesive strength value. The displacement discontinuity on the
critical plane
[]
+ =
(10)
δ
= − = − + , u u u
,
t n δ δ δ
is then associated with the critical stress condition (9), for instance, by the associated
flow rule
∂
∂ ∂
F
F
n
,
,
>
0
c τ λ δ n
c
(11)
= λ σδ
λ
,
n
t
∂
=
Made with FlippingBook - Online catalogs