Fatigue Crack Paths 2003
L2
0
σ = σ
∫
L12
(1)
a,dr
θ
0
where σθ,a was the amplitude of the stress component perpendicular to the direction,
emanating from the notch tip, which experienced the maximumrange of the normal
stress, σ0 was the fully-reversed plain fatigue limit and L was the El Haddad’s short
crack constant defined as [5]:
2
(2)
⎜ ⎜ ⎝ ⎛
⎟ ⎟ ⎞
L
= π Δ
t h K 1
σΔ
⎠
0
The M W ChaMs been applied as:
− τ + τ
(3)
⎜⎝⎛
σ
⎟⎠⎞ τσ
2
τ≤
a
0
0
amax,n
0
where τa and σn,max were the shear stress and the maximumnormal stress relative to the
plane of maximumshear stress amplitude passing through the point positioned along the
notch bisector at a distance from the notch tip equal to L/2. Here σ0 and τ0 were the
fully-reversed plain uniaxial fatigue limit and the fully-reversed plain torsional fatigue
limit, respectively.
In the present paper, stress fields along the
F = force f =displacement
measured crack paths have been studied
FfF
systematically
to form some hypotheses
capable of explaining the reason both methods
work even though the C D Mis based on a mode
γ
I governed fatigue damage, whereas the
β
M W CisMa crack initiation criterion.
r n
E X P E R I M E N TDAELTAILS
a
The material employed in the present study
was BS 040A12 low carbon steel, having the
following mechanical properties:
tensile
w
strength σT=410 MPa, fully-reversed axial
fatigue limit σ0=273 MPa, fully-reversed
torsional fatigue limit τ0=171 MPa and El
Haddad’s short-crack constant L=0.2 mm. In
phase mode I and mode II loadings have been
f
generated by using specimens having
geometries directly derived from the compact
tension-shear specimens [1, 2]. In our samples
Figure 1. Notch geometry and
cracks were substituted for V-shaped notches
symbolism.
having a nominal opening angle of 60°.
Made with FlippingBook - Online catalogs