PSI - Issue 42

Vitor S. Barbosa et al. / Procedia Structural Integrity 42 (2022) 1177–1184 V. S. Barbosa and C. Ruggieri / Structural Integrity Procedia 00 (2019) 000–000

1184

8

Acknowledgements

This investigation is supported by Fundac¸a˜o de Amparo a` Pesquisa do Estado de S£o Paulo (FAPESP) through research grant 2020 / 01903 − 8. The second author (VMCG) would like to acknowledge the financial support from Coordenac¸a˜o de Aperfeic¸oamento de Pessoal de N´ıvel Superior (CAPES). The work of CR is also supported by the Brazilian Council for Scientific and Technological Development (CNPq) through grant 302853 / 2018 − 9.

References

American Society for Testing and Materials, 2016. Standard test methods for tension testing of metallic materials, ASTM E8 / E8M-16a. American Society for Testing and Materials, 2018. Standard test method for notched bar impact testing of metallic materials, ASTM E23-16b. American Society for Testing and Materials, 2019. Standard test method for determination of reference temperature, T 0 , for ferritic steels in the transition range, ASTM E1921-19. American Society of Mechanical Engineers, 2021. Asme boiler and pressure vessel code. Barbosa, V.S., Gomes, V.M.C., Ruggieri, C., in press. Dependence of fracture toughness on temperature for an ultra high strength martensitic steel in the ductile to brittle transition region using the master curve methodology. Journal of Testing and Evaluation . EricksonKirk, M.T., Shaikh, A., EricksonKirk, M.A., 2008. Insights and observations arising from curve-fitting the Charpy V-notch and tensile data contained within the United States Light Water reactor surveillance database, in: ASME PVP 2008 Pressure Vessel and Piping Division Conference , American Society of Mechanical Engineers, Chicago, IL. Hahn, G.T., 1984. The influence of microstructure on brittle fracture toughness. Metallurgical Transactions A 15, 947–959. IAEA, 2005. Guidelines for Application of the Master Curve Approach to Reactor Pressure Vessel Integrity in Nuclear Power Plants. Technical Report Technical Report 429. International Atomic Energy Agency. Joyce, J.A., Tregoning, R.L., 2001. Development of the T 0 reference temperature from precracked charpy specimens. Engineering Fracture Mechanics 68, 861–894. Mann, N.R., Schafer, R.E., Singpurwalla, N.D., 1974. Methods for Statistical Analysis of Reliability and Life Data. Jonh Wiley & Sons, New York. McCabe, D.E., Merkle, J.G., Wallin, K., 2005. An Introduction to the Development and Use of the Master Curve Method. ASTM Manual Series MNL 27. ASTM International. Merkle, J., Wallin, K., McCabe, D., 1998. Technical basis for an ASTM standard on determining the reference temperature, T 0 , for ferritic steels in the transition range. Number NUREG CR-5504 in Oak Ridge National Laboratory Technical Report, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, United States. Project code: V7SU00063. Mueller, P., Spa¨tig, P., Bonade´, R., Odette, G.R., Gragg, D., 2009. Fracture toughness master-curve analysis of the tempered martensitic steel Eurofer97. Journal of Nuclear Materials , 323–327. Neimitz, A., Dzioba, I., Limnell, T., 2012. Modified master curve of ultra high strength steel. International Journal of Pressure Vessels and Piping 92, 19–26. Neimitz, A., Dzioba, I., Pala, T., 2014. Master curve of high-strength ferritic steel S960-QC. Key Engineering Materials 598, 178–183. Odette, G.R., Yamamoto, T., Kishimoto, H., Sokolov, M., Spa¨tig, P., Yang, W.J., Rensnman, J.W., Lucas, G.E., 2004. A master curve analysis of F82H using statistical and constraint loss size adjustment of small specimen data. Journal of Nuclear Materials , 1243–1247. Oldfield, W., 1979. Fitting curves to toughness data. Journal of Testing and Evaluation 7, 326–333. Rinne, H., 2009. The Weibull Distribution: A Handbook. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL. Ruggieri, C., Savioli, R.G., Dodds, R.H., 2015. An engineering methodology for constraint corrections of elastic-plastic fracture toughness - Part II:: E ff ects of specimen geometry and plastic strain on cleavage fracture predictions. Engineering Fracture Mechanics 146, 185–209. Thoman, D.R., Bain, L.J., Antle, C.E., 1969. Inferences on the parameters of the weibull distribution. Technometrics 11, 445–460. Wallin, 1995. Validity of small specimen fracturetouglmness estimates neglecting constraint corrections, in: Kirk, M., Bakker, A. (Eds.), Constraint E ff ects in Fracture: Theory and Application, American Society for Testing and Materials, Philadelphia. pp. 519–537. Wallin, K., 1984. The scatter in K Ic results. Engineering Fracture Mechanics 19, 1085–1093. Wallin, K., 1991. Fracture toughness transition curve shape for ferritic structural steels, in: S.H. Teoh, S.H., Lee, K.H. (Eds.), Joint FEFG / IICF International Conference on Fracture of Engineering Materials and Structures , Singapore. pp. 83–88. Wallin, K., 1993. Irradiation damage e ff ects on the fracture toughness transition curve shape for reactor pressure vessel steels. International Journal of Pressure Vessel and Piping 55, 61–79. Wallin, K., 2002. Master curve analysis of the Euro fracture toughness dataset. Engineering Fracture Mechanics 69, 451–481. Wallin, K., Pallaspuro, S., Valkonen, I., Karjalainen-Roikonen, P., 2015. Fracture properties of high performance steels and their welds. Engineering Fracture Mechanics 135, 219–231. Yamamoto, T., Odette, G., Gragg, D., Kurishita, H., Matsui, H., Yang, W., Narui, M., Yamazaki, M., 2007. Evaluation of fracture toughness master curve shifts for JMTR irradiated F82H using small specimens. Journal of Nuclear Materials , 593–598.