PSI - Issue 42

Available online at www.sciencedirect.com Structural Integrity Procedia 00 (2019) 000 – 000 Available online at www.sciencedirect.com ^ĐŝĞŶĐĞ ŝƌĞĐƚ

www.elsevier.com/locate/procedia

ScienceDirect

Procedia Structural Integrity 42 (2022) 1190–1197

23 European Conference on Fracture - ECF23 Performance of RC beams externally strengthened with hybrid CFRP and PET-FRP laminates Haya H. Mhanna a , Rami A. Hawileh b, *, Ahmad Al Rashed c , Jamal A. Abdalla b a Research Associate, Department of Civil Engineering, American University of Sharjah, P.O. Box 26666, Sharjah, United Arab Emirates b Professor, Department of Civil Engineering, American University of Sharjah, P.O. Box 26666, Sharjah, United Arab Emirates c Graduate student, Department of Civil Engineering, American University of Sharjah, P.O. Box 26666, Sharjah, United Arab Emirates * Corresponding author, email: rhaweeleh@aus.edu Abstract The use of fiber-reinforced polymers (FRP) composite materials in strengthening applications of reinforced concrete (RC) structures has been gaining wide popularity in recent decades. This is due to its superior properties such as high strength to weight ratio, durability, and versatility. In fact, it is well established that bonding FRP materials to the soffit of RC beams enhances the flexural capacity of such beams. However, the non-yielding characteristic of FRP materials is a major concern, and often results in sudden and brittle failure mode of the strengthened member. To encounter this issue, a new type of FRP materials composed from polyethylene terephthalate (PET) fibers have been developed. Compared to conventional FRPs, PET-FRP have large deformability and possess a nonlinear stress-strain relationship. Employing PET-FRP in the retrofitting industry reduces construction waste, enhances the capacity of structures and provides a solution that encourages the concept of sustainability. However, these types of large rupture strain (LRS) FRPs have lower stiffness and tensile strengths than conventional FRPs. Therefore, the main aim of this study is to combine the lower stiffness and large rupture strain of PET-FRP sheets with that of the higher stiffness and strength of carbon FRP (CFRP) sheets resulting in a new hybrid composite system. The research program consists of four RC beams externally strengthened with CFRP, PET-FRP, and their hybrid combinations, in addition to a control unstrengthened beam specimen. The beams are tested under four-point bending and load-displacement curves along with the failure modes, strength, strain in the FRP, and ductility of the beam specimens are examined. Test results indicate that strengthening with PET-FRP laminates significantly enhances the deformation capacity of the strengthened specimens compared to that with CFRP. In addition, the hybrid mix between CFRP and PET-FRPs resulted in 46-48% strength improvement compared to the unstrengthened control beam. However, the effectiveness of the hybrid system was not pronounced in terms of ductility due to the premature debonding of the concrete cover that occurred before utilizing the full strain of the hybrid system. Hence, it is advised for future research studies to anchor the hybrid sheets by means of end U-wraps or FRP spike anchors to delay the debonding failure and to exploit the benefits of the proposed hybrid system. © 2020 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) Peer-review under responsibility of 23 European Conference on Fracture - ECF23

2452-3216 © 2020 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) Peer-review under responsibility of 23 European Conference on Fracture - ECF23

2452-3216 © 2022 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0) Peer-review under responsibility of the scientific committee of the 23 European Conference on Fracture – ECF23 10.1016/j.prostr.2022.12.152