PSI - Issue 42

Davide Leonetti et al. / Procedia Structural Integrity 42 (2022) 480–489 D. Leonetti t al. / Structural Integrity Procedia 00 (2019) 000–0 0

9

488

-80

0 1 2 3 4 5 6

2.5

0

-60

2

50

-40

1.5

100

-20

1

0 Starting Level [ m/m]

0.5

150 Starting Level [ m/m]

0

0 50 100 150 Finishing Level [ m/m]

-80 -60 -40 -20 0 Finishing Level [ m/m]

(a) Location B, average of 16097 reversals

(b) Location C, average of 28960 reversals

Fig. 10: Visualization of the Markov transition matrices. The scale of the plot is multiplied by 10 − 3 .

-40 -20 0 20 40 60 80 100

-40 -20 0 20 40 60 80 100

strain [ m/m]

strain [ m/m]

0

50

100

150

200

0

50

100

150

200

half-cycles

half-cycles

(a) Location B, reduced signal

(b) Location B, re-sampled signal

10

10

0

0

-10

-10

-20

-20

strain [ m/m]

strain [ m/m]

-30

-30

-40

-40

0

50

100

150

200

0

50

100

150

200

half-cycles

half-cycles

(c) Location C, reduced signal

(d) Location C, re-sampled signal

Fig. 11: Visualization of the Markov transition matrices. The scale of the plot is multiplied by 10 − 3 .

procedure. This is more evident in location C, where the passage of single axles is self-evident, and this feature is also reported in the re-sampled signal.

4. Conclusions

The analyses reported in the present paper led to the following conclusions: