Crack Paths 2012
m/cycle ]
2
m/cycle ]
2
1
1
th r a t e
0.5
ghrowt r a t e
0.5
gwro
0.2
R e f e r e n c e c r a c k
Const.
a c k
Const.
0.2
M e a n c r
0.1
Random
Random
199+1
0.1
0.05
199+1
0.002 0.05 Meanresidual major plastic zonesize 'w*m [mm] 0.005 0.01 0.02
0.002 0.02 0.05 Meanresidual major plastic zone size 'w*m [mm] 0.005 0.01
a
b
Fig. 6: Plot of the dependence between the local meansize of the residual major cyclic
and a) mean conventional crack growth rate v, b) reference
plastic zone
* m w '
crack growth rate vref. Thick lines represent mean dependences for each loading.
C O N C L U S I O N S
Utilizing 3D representation of a fracture surface improves possibilities of the textural
fractography. However, this method is not fully objective as we expected, because
various methods of 3D reconstruction provide quite different results. Simultaneously,
the price for this alternative to S E Mimages is a substantial increase of laboriousness.
Results obtained allow to argue that reference features are governed by cyclic
plasticity corresponding to the major values of the effective SIF range 'Kef. This fact
opens a way for investigation of the relation between physical parameters of crack
growth process and the mezoscopical dimensional component of the morphology of
fracture surface.
R E F E R E N C E S
1. Lauschmann, H., Siegl, J., Šiška, F., Šumbera, J. and Nedbal, I. (2006) Materials
Characterization 56 Iss. 4-5, 257-265.
2. Lauschmann, H., Goldsmith, N. (2009). In: Fatigue crack growth, pp. 125-166,
Lignelli, A.F. (Ed.), NovaScience Publishers Inc., N e wYork.
3. Sekerešová, Z. (2011). PhDThesis (in Czech). FNSPE,Czech Technical University
Republic.
in Prague, Czech
4. Lauschnmann, H., Šiška, F. (2012) Int. Journal of Fatigue (accepted).
Acknowledgement.This research was supported by the Ministry of Industry and Trade
of the Czech Republic, Project "Operational detector of fatigue damage of structural
parts using acoustic emission", No. FR - TI2/447.
814
Made with FlippingBook Ebook Creator