Crack Paths 2012
opening
(hence, for a linear curve
V
u w ) is equal to the ModeI fracture energy
f G
against w,
). This concept can be translated to the truss elements of the
t f u f G w 2
lattice model, if one assumes to smear the crack opening along the length of the truss.
t f l G 4 3 [6]. f
H
The ultimate cracking strain
uH turns out to be
u
M E C H A N IOCFSF I B R E - R E I N F O RMC EADT E R I A L S
In this Section, the modelling of the reinforcing effects (due to fibres) within the
framework of the two theoretical approaches being compared is described. Unless
otherwise specified, details of such a modelling can be found in Refs [5, 17] and Refs
[2, 6] for the continuum model and the lattice model, respectively.
Mesomechanical Model in the Continuum Approach
The heterogeneous (composite) material is supposed to consist of a matrix phase
(denoted by the subscript m) and a fibre phase (denoted by the subscript f) embedded in
the matrix (Fig. 1). The composite material (having characteristic size D) is assumed to
have macroscopically the same mechanical characteristics of a small Representative
VolumeElement (RVE, having characteristic size D ). d
The tangent elastic tensor of the macroscopically homogeneous composite can be
determined through an energy balance between the composite and the equivalent
macroscopically homogeneous material:
« « ¬ ª S S T 0 0 ) ( ' ' d d dsd s E f mfmf m f m f f f m F F C C C (5) M T H K ) ( ) ( ) (
³ ³ » » ¼ º
'
eq ' ,' ,' C Care the tangCent elastic tensors (of the matrix, of the fibres and of f m
where
the equivalent material, respectively);
f E is the Young modulus of the fibre phase;
k kis a secFond-order tensor, where k is the unit vector parallel to the fibre axis,
^ `T M T M T cos sinsin cossin (Fig. 1). In Eq.(5),
mfH is the strain (in the matrix)
k
* u
RVE
d
z
T
k
o
y
M
x
D
Figure 1. Scheme of the R V Eand
:
Z
identification of the fibre orientation
x
* t
in the 3D space.
O
* u * * U t
Y
X
306
Made with FlippingBook Ebook Creator