Crack Paths 2009
ij S versus the uncracked ligament W / b i were estimated
The separation constants
from the constant separation parameter region in Fig. 4. The straight line fits through
()
) / l oSgi( ilWojgb−curve for the tension specimen is
these points and the slope of the
the mixed mode plastic
p l η factor for the value of W / a=0.4…0.6 (Fig. 5).
0,08
0,04
0,00
gSi j
o
n=10
0
o
-0,04
lo
15
o
30
o
45
-0,08
o
60
o
75
-0,12
-0,36
-0,24
-0,20
-0,40
-0,32
-0,28
log(bi/W)
versus
( ) i j S l o g
log( W) b/ i
for different angles of an inclined
Figure 5. Variations of
crack under tension.
pl η and
The calculated plastic
CODplη factors decrease with the increase of the crack
θ (Fig. 6). The results obtained by Smith et al. [2] show similar trends
orientation angle
of the mixed mode p l η factor for the single edge notch tension specimens (SENT) of
A508 Class 3 forged steel subjected to combination of modes I and II. It should be
pointed out that the mixed mode plastic
p l η factor is a function of both the crack angle
orientation and the strain hardening exponent. The calculated mixed mode plastic CODplη factor is also changed with the crack orientation angle (not shown), but
pl η over the whole domain of the angleθ.
CODplη exceeds the value of
At the same time, to characterise the mixed I+II mode loading, it was recommended
to employ the mixity ratio which was defined through the applied elastic parameter
e M [ 7 ]
KK
(1)
= M arctan2π e
⎟⎟⎠⎞⎜⎜⎝⎛ II
460
Made with FlippingBook flipbook maker